LIGHTFAIR 2007-With More Fluorescent Technology, Is Our Quest for Energy Efficiency Short Sighted?

by Green Talk on May 9, 2007

in lighting, recycling


fluorescent bulb

 

Lighting Fair NYC this year was home to amazing light technology from energy efficiency featuring LED technology to the reduction of mercury content in the fluorescent bulbs.  As an environmentalist I was impressed by the advancement of technology in lighting energy efficiency but was scared at the same time that we as consumers may be short sighted in our quest for energy efficiency by ignoring the proper disposal of these bulbs.

The LED technology impressed me with its long life and lack of mercury content.  In addition, Phillips and SLI lighting both featured low mercury content in their fluorescent bulbs.  SLI lighting featured the most impressive environmental concern with all of their fluorescent bulbs containing low level of mercury and their bulb glass was free of lead.

During my discussion with Flemming Jensen, Vice President of Industrial/Commercial Sales at SLI lighting about why the company was producing low mercury fluorescent bulbs and lead free glass, he made me aware of our current disposal practices of fluorescent lighting.  The world is pushing for more efficient lighting but has not looked at the disposal of the compact fluorescent.  Giants like Wal-Mart and Home Depot are offering lower priced fluorescent bulbs to encourage consumers to save energy.  It seems that no one has asked the question what about the disposal of these products after they no longer work.

 In my area in New Jersey, I have to make an appointment and then drive about thirty minutes to dispose of my fluorescent bulbs at the

County

Municipal building or wait twice a year to go to a designated location in my county to dispose of hazardous waste.  Most consumers are not going to take the time to dispose of their bulbs correctly.  It is too much of an inconvenience.  They just throw them away.   Fluorescent bulbs have mercury and lead in them, which is leaching into our soils and waterways from the landfills.

Although the world is taking notice that we need to stop global warming, there should be a simultaneous effort being made to require easily accessible places to dispose of the fluorescent lighting.  The giants like Wal-Mart, could easily exchange burnt out fluorescent bulbs for new ones with a discount offered to encourage people to recycle. 

Cities and counties could have more accessible place for people to drop off their bulbs like they drop off their newspapers and plastics.  The only way for more easily accessible recycling to be achieved is for the consumers to demand it. In addition, we can demand that bulbs are made of low levels of mercury and lead free glass.  We have the power in this world because we speak in the language of money.   We have asked for more energy efficient technology; let’s now demand for our landfills to remain lead and mercury free.

Similar Posts:

If you enjoyed this post, make sure you subscribe to my RSS feed!

{ 5 trackbacks }

Blue Sky Mining » Guest Post: LIGHTFAIR 2007-With More Fluorescent Technology, Is Our Quest for Energy Efficiency Short-Sighted?
May 16, 2007 at 8:26 am
annahackman » Blog Archive » Guest Post: LIGHTFAIR 2007-With More Fluorescent Technology, Is Our Quest for Energy Efficiency Short-Sighted?
October 31, 2007 at 2:15 am
Guest Post: LIGHTFAIR 2007-With More Fluorescent Technology, Is Our Quest for Energy Efficiency Short-Sighted? : CleanTechnica
February 6, 2008 at 7:25 am
Home Depot Offers Free Recycling for Burnt-Out CFL | Green Talk
July 4, 2008 at 11:02 pm
Guest Post: LIGHTFAIR 2007-With More Fluorescent Technology, Is Our Quest for Energy Efficiency Short-Sighted? : annahackman - Green Options
March 3, 2009 at 9:09 pm

{ 5 comments… read them below or add one }

1 greenlady May 14, 2007 at 2:58 pm

Hi, do you live near an IKEA? They accept CFL bulbs for recycling. Also there is a new bulb on the market called ecoLED. It has no mercury. If you google ecoLED you can find the company. Have a great day!

2 admin May 14, 2007 at 5:02 pm

Thanks for the tip, Green Lady! So if you are visiting IKEA, take your CFLs and check out their sustainable furniture. Green Lady, you must have read my mind. I will be posting about LIGHTFAIR and what I learned about LEDs. I did find the company (ecoleds) and will be speaking to them. Just be careful about LEDs since it depends on your appplication. What I have learned is right now they are very directional lighting. The one on EcoLED that I saw produces 1.6 watts. At LIGHTFAIR a bulb that produced 1 watt was considered ambient lighting (mood lighting not reading lighting.) I will let you know.

3 paul January 2, 2008 at 2:51 pm

i recently made the push to change my bulbs to compact flu. then i found out about the mercury and started asking the same questions you did. you’re right – most consumer are not going to take the time and hassle to dispose these correctly. it’s a short-sighted solution that is being business driven. i’m awaiting the arrival of led and oled.

paul’s last blog post..LG Unveils 52 Inch Multi Touch Display

4 portable heater December 2, 2008 at 2:35 am

What if we don’t drop off our newspaper and plastics? A great many cities offer a recycle pickup in addition to trash pickup. Is it safe to place these types of things with those as well, or should we try to find another way to dispose of them?

5 Green Talk December 10, 2008 at 2:30 pm

Portable, to the best of my knowledge, you can’t put them with your recycling. I wish. However, many counties have drop offs for you to recycle them. In addition, since I wrote the post Home Depot is taking them for free. See my story on home depot http://www.green-talk.com/2008.....t-out-cfl/

Leave a Comment

CommentLuv Enabled

*
To prove you're a person (not a spam script), type the security word shown in the picture. Click on the picture to hear an audio file of the word.
Click to hear an audio file of the anti-spam word

Clicky Web Analytics