<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Contech Stormwater Solutions Reduce Pollutants and CO2</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.green-talk.com/2009/03/12/contech-stormwater-solutions-reduce-pollutants-and-co2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.green-talk.com/2009/03/12/contech-stormwater-solutions-reduce-pollutants-and-co2/</link>
	<description>Turning the Planet Green, One Conversation at a Time</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 19:37:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Natalie Office Chairs</title>
		<link>http://www.green-talk.com/2009/03/12/contech-stormwater-solutions-reduce-pollutants-and-co2/#comment-7489</link>
		<dc:creator>Natalie Office Chairs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 10:35:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.green-talk.com/?p=1968#comment-7489</guid>
		<description>I had no idea that coal ash was radioactive, that was something new for me, thanks for the comment on it interesting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had no idea that coal ash was radioactive, that was something new for me, thanks for the comment on it interesting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Green Talk</title>
		<link>http://www.green-talk.com/2009/03/12/contech-stormwater-solutions-reduce-pollutants-and-co2/#comment-4178</link>
		<dc:creator>Green Talk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Mar 2009 17:50:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.green-talk.com/?p=1968#comment-4178</guid>
		<description>Nadine, I am glad you brought this up because I have read different accounts about fly ash with regards to radon and uranium.  The US Dept of Interior, US Geological study concluded in 1997 the following:

&quot;Radioactive elements in coal and fly ash should not be sources of alarm. The vast majority of coal and the majority of fly ash are not significantly enriched in radioactive elements, or in associated radioactivity, compared to common soils or rocks. This observation provides a useful geologic perspective for addressing societal concerns regarding possible radiation and radon hazard. 
     The location and form of radioactive elements in fly ash determine the availability of elements for leaching during ash utilization or disposal. Existing measurements of uranium distribution in fly ash particles indicate a uniform distribution of uranium throughout the glassy particles. The apparent absence of abundant, surface-bound, relatively available uranium suggests that the rate of release of uranium is dominantly controlled by the relatively slow dissolution of host ash particles. 
     Previous studies of dissolved radioelements in the environment, and existing knowledge of the chemical properties of uranium and radium can be used to predict the most important chemical controls, such as pH, on solubility of uranium and radium when fly ash interacts with water. Limited measurements of dissolved uranium and radium in water leachates of fly ash and in natural water from some ash disposal sites indicate that dissolved concentrations of these radioactive elements are below levels of human health concern.&quot; (http://pubs.usgs.gov/fs/1997/fs163-97/FS-163-97.html)

It is quite an interesting article to read.  However, I do think this something to be concerned about.  Nadine, do you have more information about this?  (ie some sources or articles you can give us.)  Thanks for bring this up. Anna</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nadine, I am glad you brought this up because I have read different accounts about fly ash with regards to radon and uranium.  The US Dept of Interior, US Geological study concluded in 1997 the following:</p>
<p>&#8220;Radioactive elements in coal and fly ash should not be sources of alarm. The vast majority of coal and the majority of fly ash are not significantly enriched in radioactive elements, or in associated radioactivity, compared to common soils or rocks. This observation provides a useful geologic perspective for addressing societal concerns regarding possible radiation and radon hazard.<br />
     The location and form of radioactive elements in fly ash determine the availability of elements for leaching during ash utilization or disposal. Existing measurements of uranium distribution in fly ash particles indicate a uniform distribution of uranium throughout the glassy particles. The apparent absence of abundant, surface-bound, relatively available uranium suggests that the rate of release of uranium is dominantly controlled by the relatively slow dissolution of host ash particles.<br />
     Previous studies of dissolved radioelements in the environment, and existing knowledge of the chemical properties of uranium and radium can be used to predict the most important chemical controls, such as pH, on solubility of uranium and radium when fly ash interacts with water. Limited measurements of dissolved uranium and radium in water leachates of fly ash and in natural water from some ash disposal sites indicate that dissolved concentrations of these radioactive elements are below levels of human health concern.&#8221; (<a href="http://pubs.usgs.gov/fs/1997/fs163-97/FS-163-97.html" rel="nofollow">http://pubs.usgs.gov/fs/1997/f.....63-97.html</a>)</p>
<p>It is quite an interesting article to read.  However, I do think this something to be concerned about.  Nadine, do you have more information about this?  (ie some sources or articles you can give us.)  Thanks for bring this up. Anna</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nadine anddanes</title>
		<link>http://www.green-talk.com/2009/03/12/contech-stormwater-solutions-reduce-pollutants-and-co2/#comment-4174</link>
		<dc:creator>nadine anddanes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Mar 2009 00:36:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.green-talk.com/?p=1968#comment-4174</guid>
		<description>I wonder if there is any radioactive particles in the ash. Coal ash is radioactive, and it&#039;s a big problem.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder if there is any radioactive particles in the ash. Coal ash is radioactive, and it&#8217;s a big problem.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

